Passed a booth at PyCon for the AstroHaus Freewrite, a Kickstarter-backed "distraction-free writing tool" combining a small e-ink screen with a mechanical keyboard in a fixed plastic shell for a whopping $550.
I inquired about the firmware.
"Actually it runs Debian!" said the dude.
"Oh! So I could install ssh and..."
"No," he said incredulously, "we're not going to give people root!"
TFW name-dropping one of the most freedom-focused OSes to sell a device that restricts those same freedoms.
But just then a bro wandered past and chuckled, "Ha ha, nothing's unbreakable! Some clever hacker will root it eventually!"
Which was even worse.
He could have backed me up and said "the right to repair and tinker is important,"
but instead he undermined me,
giving this dude a pass for tivoizing as hard as he could,
happily accepting corporate control as a matter of course,
because hackers are ✨magic✨.
Just because a lot of stuff has been hacked doesn't mean it's easy, or inevitable.
someone crowdfund a little 3d-printed kit that attaches a kobo e-reader (runs linux, easily replaceable firmware) to your favorite mechanical keyboard and drink AstroHaus's milkshake pls kthx
Example: The TRS-80 model 100 from 1983. Main focus was word processing on the go with installable applications. Internal modem and 20 hour battery life on 4 AA batteries.
i wish at least some modern-speed tech aimed for old, cheap and open instead of locked-down, high-res, and color
i've got a parts box full of old palm pilots that i hope to someday be skilled enough to scavenge the LCDs off of to re-purpose
that said, i like e-ink too, and modules aren't very expensive: https://www.waveshare.com/product/4.2inch-e-paper-module.htm
Many of the reactions to my complaints about the Freewrite have been: "it's a dumb device with bad ergonomics, just use a refurb laptop with distraction-free software"
While I might agree, it's easy to find positive reviews of the Freewrite online. Many writer-types enjoy it and even defend the ridiculous price tag.
Which is mildly encouraging: if you can build a cheaper e-ink display + keyboard combo that doesn't needlessly restrict users' right to repair, there's a proven market for it.
@pho4cexa Why not just the display so people can use their keyboard of choice?
@pho4cexa it is not dumb device and for sure it is better than a refurb laptop.
You do not need to charge it every day and it is distraction free *out-of-the-box*. No additional steps required.
*But* you can connect a keyboard to an e-reader (hell, you can even use it as a remote screen https://github.com/borzunov/remoteink).
Still, an integrated&dedicated device is better for creating healthy habits and has better accessibility, especially for elders.
Not everyone can afford DIY solutions/hacks.
@pho4cexa This is very similar to a concept I have partially designed, though I didn't select an e-ink display. My intention was to release the sources (kicad, case designs, BOMs) as CC-BY-SA if/when I had a minimally functional prototype.
This is motivation to revive that effort, though I'd need some modest funding to get the prototype completed and launch a crowdsupply campaign for production 🤔
@polyplacophora i wrote about this a bit! there's some links on this page you'll probably enjoy
@pho4cexa as a hacker this whole situation bugs me so much:
1. An embedded word processor running full debian shows that they have no idea how to build an embedded device. Only way I’d excuse this for a production product is maybe if the whole thing was running off a Raspberry PI.
@pho4cexa 2. using Debian and not giving the owner of the device root access, even if it was something they had to request the password for manually is very shortsighted
3. Just because you can maybe hack root out of it doesn’t mean you should have to. Having to hack it adds an unnecessary barrier to modifying the device that the user presumably owns, and is just a huge waste of time. Far from a simple wave of a magic wand.
@packetcharmer @pho4cexa also in Europe at least they are competing with refurb laptops being sold for half that price (as cheap as €120); you can simply install various "low distraction" content editors on them (there were a couple of freeware ones last time I checked), dual boot Debian with Windows (if there is better software on Linux) and shut off the wifi, all of which is still less effort than trying to hack root on a proprietary device.
@bhtooefr @pho4cexa I didn’t even want to get into the price because I figured that was another example of them not knowing what they were doing. “Market research? What’s that?” Honestly done right an RPi based solution would work great, but they don’t even have the experience to know they way they’re doing this is completely wrong. My bet is that their BOM cost is probably 3-5x what you think it is meaning at $500 they’re not even making as much as you’d think.
Eh, I kind of get it. Right now, the price difference between a 16-bit microcontroller and full Unix SOC is about five bucks and full Debian means you get all of the tools.
The savings in dev costs and related aggravations probably make up for the loss of a couple of bucks profit on an $600 unit.
@pho4cexa @cstanhope this is not even a new thing; its been hanging around for at least 2 years (trying to hustle for funding I think) and is itself based on a lot of similar 1980s/90s devices; but all of these were less locked down and could be used as actual computers as well. IMO *not* selling it as fully open device could be why they are finding funding difficult; it would otherwise also be perfect for sysadmins who want to connect to the console of other equipment..
@karlen you'd think so, but their attitude seems to be that they are and must remain the exclusive purveyors of a carefully-curated experience for their target market, who are non-technical writers, authors, and journalists, definitely not tinkers and computer nerds
LB: this is the perfect explanation of what corporations think technology is for
"purified water, like people can get at home, but in a BOTTLE that WE CONTROL"
so it goes
@pho4cexa ausgufhh i luv the design on that thing but $550 is at least $450 too much for an eink page, a nice keyboard, and a computer that only needs to be powerful enough to run a bare bones word processor.
would be wanting to scoop one up for cheap on ebay once it flops tho
@suetanvil yes, one of the big features of GPLv3 is the "anti-tivoization" clause. Unfortunately Linus hates v3 and thinks tivoization is fine. (The kernel is GPLv2.)
So since they post the source code for the GPL2 stuff they used, they comply with the letter of the license, even while they still prevent users from doing anything useful with it.
Yeah that's weird. I don't even program (just now learning Ruby) but when I decided I wanted to try to make a similarly distraction free writing environment for myself, I put Tahrpup on a stick and deleted the programs I didn't want. Even that was an overly bulky solution for just a glorified word processor. Why use Debian?
@pho4cexa Its all about the money 😞
@pho4cexa Like, what the actual fuck...
@pho4cexa That is one of the stupidest things I've ever seen. It looks like it's from the 1980s.
It should be a clamshell and everything on the top should be replaced with a modern full color display.
It looks like some neckbeard's wet dream of stupid fetishes for old style hardware, without any concern for practical application.
slapping a full color display on it would add zero value when it comes to writing, and would just make it more distracting and expensive (except this particular product is already needlessly expensive). maybe for other use cases it'd be nice. making it open and close would also make it more complicated than it has to be. sometimes less is more, which apparently equates to "old style hardware" in your opinion.